Raj, that sounds really callous, and not really fair. Yeah, the CCP sucks in many ways and China’s athletic training system is an atrocity and they cover up a lot of shit. But to paint the whole country with such a broad and damning brush… Well, it’s just not that simple. There are many aspects of the party that I now detest more than I ever did before. At the same time I recognize that labeling the entire system as evil and bad is a shallow diagnosis, especially since to many life in China has vastly improved and there is a high level of support from much of the population despite all the evil. Now, a lot of that is built on propaganda and bullshit, but about life being continuously better for many - well that cannot be disputed. Maybe the lives of many have also gotten worse, and maybe the system still hasn’t gone through the test of a true recession. A lot is uncertain and a lot is fragile and tenuous. But to see only bad and evil isn’t healthy and it isn’t realistic.
留言（6 条）
在 同一个世界，同一个梦想 留言：
Raj, that sounds really callous, and not really fair. Yeah, the CCP sucks in many ways and China’s athletic training system is an atrocity and they cover up a lot of shit. But to paint the whole country with such a broad and damning brush… Well, it’s just not that simple. There are many aspects of the party that I now detest more than I ever did before. At the same time I recognize that labeling the entire system as evil and bad is a shallow diagnosis, especially since to many life in China has vastly improved and there is a high level of support from much of the population despite all the evil. Now, a lot of that is built on propaganda and bullshit, but about life being continuously better for many - well that cannot be disputed. Maybe the lives of many have also gotten worse, and maybe the system still hasn’t gone through the test of a true recession. A lot is uncertain and a lot is fragile and tenuous. But to see only bad and evil isn’t healthy and it isn’t realistic.
2008-08-15 03:34:23
在 为什么欧美工人的工资高？ 留言：
其实都可以从“物以稀为贵”这句话去想了。
美国捡垃圾的都比中国捡垃圾的人赚的多，其实只是他们捡的人少，相对于其他行业少。就像阮文里说的，美国人少钱多，所以人就贵，而中国钱少人多，所以人就贱。说一般均衡，说同质因素，其实都是这一个道理。像昌平和北京城区，像太原和北京相比，如果可以随便而轻易地流动，为什么人不到那些给钱的地方去？大家都去的结果就是没有给钱高的地方，而是都一样了。
2008-05-11 22:12:07
在 《哈姆莱特》（Hamlet）：摘录（第二部分） 留言：
So应该指的是前一句:I did love you once.
不过我没看过原文，这里可能有断章取义之嫌。呵呵
2008-05-09 18:52:54
在 如何变得有思想？ 留言：
在我脑海中，思想应该是观点之母，有思想才能有观点，而有观点，有很多观点，甚至都不知道这些观点从哪里来，是不是真的的人我想是没有什么思想的。
2008-05-09 18:34:33
在 为什么欧美工人的工资高？ 留言：
我想我前面评论的price应该改成cost才对。
2008-05-09 18:22:51
在 为什么欧美工人的工资高？ 留言：
HOS里面最重要的是homogeneous factors，在你这里昌平和专区劳动力就不是homogeneous factors,如果昌平的人可以自由的在昌平和城区之间来往，并不产生任何price，像挤公交的时间啦，他挤完公交在城区工作的精神情绪上的不适啦等等，如果没有这些的话，我想，应该就没有昌平和城区之间待遇的差异。
2008-05-09 18:21:30